You'll be hard-pressed to find a gallon of gas below $3.99 in Austin as national gas prices reached an all-time high of $4.32 per gallon Thursday, causing some Austin residents to think twice before grabbing their car keys.
Gas prices on E. Riverside Dr. were almost all $3.99, including at the Apple Mart. (Claire Partain/Austonia)
For Austinites like Francisco "Fran" Ordaz, that means making small adjustments to his schedule.
"I walk to the store a bit more now," Ordaz said. "Not a huge change, but a change nonetheless."
Are current gas prices going to affect how much you drive? Let me know why/more opinions in the comments!
— Claire (@partain_claire) March 10, 2022
For others who need to drive to get anywhere, the new spike in prices will just empty their wallets further as other necessary expenses, like rent and groceries, continue to rise.
"It's atrocious," Stefan, who said he wasn't comfortable with giving his full name, told Austonia. "To do anything—groceries, work, anything—driving is still a big part of my life, but at the same time I might Uber at some point."
Even though most Americans—around 83%—still rely on driving most days, many gas pumps near E. Riverside Drive were empty Thursday morning.
The Mobil gas station on Oltorf St. was mostly empty Thursday morning. (Claire Partain/Austonia)
Sam Devkota, who works at Apple Mart at 2101 Wickersham Ln., said the gas station saw traffic go up and then down as drivers scrambled to get cheaper gas before it reached $3.99
"We've seen a little bit less," Devkota said. " I think it will go down and down tomorrow."
Some Austinites, like Jeroen Naus, are rejoicing in their remote work schedule amid the spike.
"Working from home, my driving has gone down significantly," Naus said. "(I spend) less time stuck in traffic."
Naus thinks ride-sharing apps like Uber will see the biggest impact in coming weeks, and the company already reported higher than anticipated February demand on Monday, reaching just 10% below pre-pandemic levels.
But more expensive gas means more expenses for Uber drivers, who took to social media to air their frustrations. Some even quit as they complained that they barely broke even with the heightened price.
Meanwhile, some Austin residents, like Peter Dolan, aren't having any pain at the pump.
Peter Dolan has been impressed with his Tesla, from low transportation costs to plenty of trunk space. (Claire Partain/Austonia)
That's because Dolan and his wife swapped their sedan and minivan for Teslas a few years back. For Dolan, a trip to Nashville and back cost him $35—roughly the same as one typical full tank of gas.
A source told Electrek that Tesla orders in certain parts of the country increased 100% this week, and Dolan said he thinks that trend will continue as more people cut out gas prices completely with electric vehicles.
"Tesla orders are screaming right now," Dolan said. "Because people are just saying, 'Wait a minute, what's going on here? How much am I going to have to pay?' The infrastructure is there and so it's really just a matter of time."
For those still stuck at the pump, the worst may be yet to come: fuel savings app GasBuddy's 2022 gas price predictions say prices could peak at $4.25 in May.
But what comes up, must come down, according to Ben, who wasn't comfortable disclosing his full name.
"It'll go back down later... that's the way I see it," Ben said. "I'll go wherever I need to go."
- How crypto is being used to support Ukraine - austonia ›
- Formula 1 ends deal with Russian Grand Prix amid Ukraine war ... ›
- Austin's Russian House changes name in solidarity with Ukraine ... ›
- Texas gov. orders natural gas suppliers not to export supply - austonia ›
- For the second year in a row, Austin tops list of Uber riders leaving stuff behind - austonia ›
- Austinites spending $100+ on gas as prices reach never before seen heights - austonia ›
Flyers are less satisfied with the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport than a year ago, a new study shows.
Research firm J.D. Power placed ABIA at No. 15 on a list ranking overall customer satisfaction at large airports, a slip from last year’s spot at No. 7. Other Texas airports secured rankings ahead of Austin, with Dallas Love Field at third, Houston Hobby at eight, and San Antonio International Airport at ninth.
Dallas/Ft. Worth ranked eight in the "mega airport" category.
The study examined airports based on the following factors: terminal facilities; airport arrival/departure; baggage claim; security check; check-in/baggage check; and food, beverage and retail.
On a 1,000-point scale, Austin-Bergstrom received 785 points this year compared to its score of 819 in 2021.
Passenger experiences at Austin-Bergstrom have been influenced by population growth in Central Texas, which has brought record traffic and longer wait times at TSA. And a recent power outage at Austin-Bergstrom caused flight delays. Michael Taylor, travel intelligence lead at J.D. Power., said that consumer satisfaction with flying has decreased overall.
“The combination of pent-up demand for air travel, the nationwide labor shortage and steadily rising prices on everything from jet fuel to a bottle of water have created a scenario in which airports are extremely crowded and passengers are increasingly frustrated—and it is likely to continue through 2023,” Taylor said.
Bailey Grimmett, a spokesperson for ABIA, commented on the ranking.
“We're grateful that AUS customers continue to rank our airport above average, especially during this year that saw air travel disruption here in Austin and across the globe as airports, airlines and the air travel industry continued navigating the impacts of the pandemic,” Grimmett said. “We look forward to delivering near-term and long-term improvements through our Journey With AUS program to improve the passenger experience.”
That program is slated to bring a new midfield concourse to increase gates and connect to the Barbara Jordan Terminal through an underground connector tunnel.
- July was Austin-Bergstrom airport's fifth-busiest month ever amid ... ›
- Complete guide to Austin-Bergstrom International Airport - austonia ›
- New changes coming to the Austin Airport in 2022 - austonia ›
- Austin-Bergstrom International Airport sees high traffic - austonia ›
- Traffic plans as Austin airport expects 20M people this year - austonia ›
- Busy Memorial Day travel season starts smoothly at the airport ... ›
- Austin airport will close South Terminal as part of expansion - austonia ›
By Jonathan Lee
The Planning Commission was split Tuesday on whether to help save an eclectic lakefront estate from demolition by zoning it historic amid concerns over tax breaks and the likelihood that a previous owner participated in segregation as a business owner.
The property in question, known as the Delisle House, is located at 2002 Scenic Drive in Tarrytown. The main house, with Spanish and Modern influences, was built in 1923 by Raymond Delisle, an optician. A Gothic Revival accessory apartment was built in 1946. The current owner applied to demolish the structures in order to build a new home.'
Historic preservationists, for their part, overwhelmingly support historic zoning, which would preserve the buildings in perpetuity. The Historic Landmark Commission unanimously voted to initiate historic zoning in July, citing architectural significance, landscape features and association to historic figures. City staffers recommend historic zoning, calling both structures one-of-a-kind examples of vernacular architecture.
Tarrytown neighbors have also banded together to stop the demolition. Many have written letters, and a few spoke at the meeting. “How could anyone buy this property with the intent of destroying it?” Ila Falvey said. “I think it’s an architectural treasure.”
Michael Whellan, an attorney representing the property owner, said that the claims made by preservationists are shaky. The buildings are run down, he said, and have had substantial renovations. A structural engineer hired by the owner said any attempt at preservation would involve tearing down and rebuilding – an undertaking Whellan said would likely cost millions.
Whellan also argued that any historical significance derived from the property’s association with Delisle and longtime owner C.H. Slator is dubious. “These men are not noted for any civic, philanthropic or historic impact,” he said.
What’s more, according to Whellan, Slator likely participated in segregation as the owner of the Tavern on North Lamar Boulevard between 1953 and 1960.
A city staffer, however, said she found no evidence to support the claim. “We would never landmark a property where a segregationist lived, or there was a racist person,” Kimberly Collins with the Historic Preservation Office said.
Commissioner Awais Azhar couldn’t support historic zoning in part due to lingering uncertainty about Slator. “Focusing on that factor is not here to disparage an individual or family. It is not about playing the race card. This is an important assertion for us to consider as Planning commissioners,” Azhar said.
Commissioner Carmen Llanes Pulido said that allegations of racism should come as no surprise. “We’re talking about white male property owners in the 1950s, in Austin, on the west side – and of course they were racist,” she said. But she argued that allowing the house to be demolished based on these grounds does nothing to help people of color who have been harmed by racism and segregation.
The question of tax breaks was also controversial. Michael Gaudini, representing the property owner, said that the tax breaks associated with historic zoning would exacerbate inequality by shifting property tax burdens to less affluent communities. City staffers estimate that the property, appraised at $3.5 million, would get either a $8,500 or $16,107 property tax break annually, depending on whether a homestead exemption is applied.
Commissioner Grayson Cox preferred the commission focus not on tax breaks but on whether the structures merit preservation. “To me, nothing in the historic preservation criteria lists, is this person deserving of a tax break or not?”
Azhar, on the other hand, said he plans to propose a code amendment getting rid of city property tax breaks for historic properties.
The commission fell one vote short of recommending historic zoning, with six commissioners in support and three opposed. Azhar and commissioners Claire Hempel and Greg Anderson voted against.
The odds of City Council zoning over an owner’s wishes are slim. Nine out of 11 members must vote in favor, and there have only been a handful of such cases over the past several decades.