Austin PAC submits signatures in favor of city charter changes including a shift to a strong mayor system
A new political action committee submitted more than 24,000 signatures in support of four city charter amendments to the Austin City Clerk on Monday morning. If validated, the petition will be placed on the May 1 ballot for Austin voters to decide.
Austinites for Progressive Reform aims to increase voter turnout by:
- Moving mayoral elections to presidential election years
- Instituting ranked-choice voting when allowed under state law to eliminate runoff elections
- Implementing a public campaign funding program that would give voters $25 vouchers to support the local candidates of their choice
- Shifting from a strong city manager form of government to a strong mayor form
"We all share a common commitment to ensuring as many voices are heard as possible," co-founder Jim Wick told Austonia.
The PAC formed in July and convened a 15-member, policy-making steering committee to draft the amendments over three months. The group then conducted a five-week community engagement process, hearing from nearly 200 Austinites at 17 meetings.
The amendment to make Austin a strong-mayor city has drawn the most pushback.
Currently, Austin operates like a business: an elected board of directors (City Council) is led by a chairperson (the mayor) who work together to set policies. The city manager, whom they appoint, functions like a CEO, directing the implementation of those policies and managing city staff.
Under the proposed amendment, Austin would shift to a strong mayor system; the city manager position would be eliminated and replaced by the mayor, who would not be able to vote on items brought to council but could veto legislation approved by its members.
"We just possess a fundamental belief that Austinites should be able to vote for the person who runs the city," Wick said, pointing to a 2009 study from the Center for Public Policy and Political Studies that found lower voter turnout in strong-manager cities.
The PAC also pointed to the origins of Austin's strong-manager form of government: a 1924 charter revision campaign led by Monroe Shipe, the developer of Hyde Park, which was advertised as a white-only neighborhood.
"Austin must come to terms with how its current form of government came about during the Jim Crow era," Austin NAACP President and ARP co-chair Nelson Linder said in a statement Monday.
Not everyone supports this proposal.
Fifteen community members—including labor union representatives, criminal justice reform advocates and one former steering committee member—wrote a letter to ARP Chair Andrew Allison on Dec. 15 opposing the strong mayor amendment, which they argue will undercut the gains achieved under the 10-1 system.
"If passed, your amendment would reward these efforts and hard-earned results by hollowing out the Council's power and transferring it to a single, unknown person in 2022," they wrote.
Carol Guthrie, a representative for the AFSCME Local 1624 union, which represents the city of Austin and Travis County employees, said the current system is preferable because of the demands of the job, which include overseeing the city's airport, convention center and utilities. "We need a highly qualified person for that job," she told Austonia.
Guthrie also worries that a strong mayor system would corrode the existing checks and balances in place. "Right now, there's a lot of turmoil in Austin," she said. "But if, at the end of the day, the City Council does not like how the city manager is performing, they can fire him. That's the accountability piece right there. If we elect a mayor for four years and we don't like the job that that person's doing, they could do a lot of damage."
Last summer, seven council members called on Austin Police Department Chief Brian Manley to resign in the wake of mass protests against police violence. Police chiefs cannot be fired, under state law, but City Manager Spencer Cronk could have demoted him. Manley remains chief. Under a strong mayor system, the mayor would hire and manage city department heads, such as the police chief, rather than the city manager.
Additionally, the citizens group Austin For All People announced its formation in opposition to the strong mayor amendment on Monday. Its leadership includes Kerbey Lane Cafe CEO Mason Ayer, retired Seton Healthcare Family CEO Jesus Garza and Enoch Kever member Catherine Morse.
What is a council-manager form of government? #A4AP #Austin https://t.co/6XVHEqI4Rm— Austin for All People (@Austin for All People) 1610376306.0
AF4P argues that a strong mayor system would transfer power "to the politically connected members of society" and criticized ARP for rushing to change the city government "in the middle of a global pandemic."
Wick is not surprised by the opposition.
"Any time that you discuss as a community changing the power structure of the municipal government, there's going to be some objections," he said. "Particularly some objections from groups that find the status quo acceptable for their causes."
The other amendments
The first three amendments are progressive agenda items intended to drive voter turnout and reform campaign finance.
Mid-term and runoff electorates are typically much smaller—and tend to skew older and more conservative—than the general electorate during presidential years. For example, 35,550 people voted in the District 6 Austin City Council race during the Nov. 3 general election, compared to 15,256 during the Dec. 15 runoff, which saw conservative candidate Mackenzie Kelly oust incumbent Democrat Jimmy Flannigan.
Ranked choice voting, while favored by progressives because it would eliminate low turnout runoffs altogether, is currently prohibited under state law. A city charter amendment, even if passed, would not be implemented unless state lawmakers make the same change.
A "Democracy Dollars" program would use city funds to issue vouchers to voters to donate to the City Council and mayoral candidate of their choice, who could then redeem them for cash. Such a program is already in place in Seattle, where it has driven turnout and increased donor diversity. It also led to a lawsuit from two local property owners, who argued the program violated their right to free speech by forcing them to support candidates they didn't like with their tax dollars.
The city of Austin requires 20,000 valid signatures for a petition to make it on the upcoming ballot. Typically, it takes around two weeks from the date the petition is received for it to be analyzed by the city clerk. If validated, the petition will be included on the local ballot for the May 1 uniform general election, ahead of the 2022 mayoral race.
- Save Austin Now relaunches petition to reinstate camping ban ... ›
- Thousands in Austin march against police brutality - austonia ›
- Austin Police Department changes get unanimous City Council ... ›
- Austin City Clerk validates strong mayor petition - austonia ›
- Austin voters will decide fate of camping ban, strong mayor - austonia ›
- Austin City Council could grow to 13 districts - austonia ›
- Austonia's guide to the May 1 local election - austonia ›
- Strong mayor proposal encounters diverse coalition of opoonents - austonia ›
- Pro vs. con: How should Austin vote on strong-mayor Prop F? - austonia ›
Communities are rallying together after an 18-year-old shot and killed 19 students and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas.
Funds from organizations all around the state–including from Austin’s own Los Verdes–are being raised to support families affected by the tragedy. Here's how you can help.
If you are looking for ways to help, please consider donating blood. Your donation can help ensure we have supplies immediately available for the victims of this tragic shooting.— University Health (@UnivHealthSA) May 24, 2022
Our donor room has availability the rest of the week. Please schedule online: https://t.co/0F2lKDqYzO
Austin-area residents can donate blood with We Are Blood.
South Texas Blood & Tissue was able to send a total of 25 units of blood both to the school and local hospitals to support treatment. After an emergency blood drive on Wednesday, the blood center is hosting a Memorial Day blood drive and should have appointments opening the following week.
The largest blood transfuser in the San Antonio area, the University Health System, is also asking members of the community to donate blood. Appointments may be scarce due to demand.
The Los Verdes community is heartbroken at today's senseless act of gun violence in Uvalde that ended 15 lives too early. We are currently raising funds to support the families who lost loved ones today, and you can join by donating here. https://t.co/52L1ZtbSND— Los Verdes (@LosVerdesATX) May 24, 2022
There is a growing list of verified fundraisers through GoFundMe, where almost $2 million has been raised so far for families and victims of the tragedy.
- The VictimsFirst fundraiser is raising $2 million to provide “100% of what is collected” to the victims’ family members.
- Austin-based Los Verdes Supporter Group is raising $100,000 for the families “affected by the horrific school shooting at Robb Elementary.”
- Allison McCullough, the aunt of victim Makenna Lee Elrod, is raising $50,000 for her family.
- The Alithia Ramirez funeral fund is working on raising $8,000 for the young girl’s funeral.
- More are being added by the hour.
An official account with First State Bank has been set up for donations through UCISD to assist the families of this tragedy.— Uvalde CISD (@Uvalde_CISD) May 25, 2022
Please know that the FSB account, is the only verified location to make any monetary donations. No other source is currently recognized. pic.twitter.com/psQb6fD6Ls
Uvalde CISD has opened an account to support families of the victims with the First State Bank of Uvalde. Checks to donate should be made payable to the "Robb School Memorial Fund" or through Zelle at email@example.com.
The League of United Latin American Citizens has created a fund for victims, which it says will donate 100% to families and University Health has also organized the Uvalde Victims Relief Fund to help provide care for victims.H-E-B has also donated $500,000 to aid victims and is collecting donations for its Spirit of Giving Fund, which supports philanthropic efforts in the wake of Texas tragedies. Starting Wednesday, shoppers at H-E-B, Central Market, Joe V’s Smart Shop and Mi Tienda can donate at checkout or online.
By Patrick Svitek
Beto O'Rourke caused a dramatic scene on Wednesday when he angrily confronted Gov. Greg Abbott at his news conference about the Uvalde school shooting, yelling, "This is on you."
After Abbott was done giving his initial remarks, O'Rourke approached the stage and told Abbott he was "doing nothing" to combat gun violence. He said the Uvalde massacre, in which a gunman killed 19 children and two adults, was "totally predictable."
Some of the Republican officials onstage with Abbott quickly denounced O'Rourke, telling him to go away. Another man onstage used expletives to criticize O'Rourke for interrupting the event. O'Rourke was eventually escorted away amid the unruly scene.
“I can’t believe that you’re a sick son of a bitch that would come to a deal like this to make a political issue,” Uvalde Mayor Don McLaughlin told O'Rourke at one point.
.@BetoORourke just showed up and shook things up. @statesmanpic.twitter.com/Z1FtBwUEdJ
— Luz Moreno-Lozano 🦇 (@LuzMorenoLozano) May 25, 2022