100% Austin news, info, and entertainment, straight to your inbox at 6 a.m. every morning.
In five minutes, you're fully informed and ready to start another great day in our city.
Austin vs. Denver: Why the Colorado capital is gaining more millennials than any other city, including ours
Austin isn't the only city attracting millennials and Bay Area tech companies with its outdoorsy profile, local breweries, progressive politics and Major League Soccer team. Denver, Colorado, has seen significant population growth in recent years and lures a similar crowd, including some Austinites in search of a change of scenery.
The two capital cities, 920 miles apart, have seen their populations grow more than 20% since 2010, according to census data. Both are top destinations among millennials, a recent SmartAsset analysis found, as well as the companies hoping to hire them. Despite Austin's steady population growth, Denver is the top out-of-state metro with a deficit migration flow, meaning more Austinites are moving to Denver than Denverites are moving here.
Megan Ivy, a broker with Denver-based Usaj Realty who was born and raised in Austin, often hears from people who are moving from Austin to Denver or vice versa. Perhaps even more common, however, is the person who is moving from a larger coastal city—San Francisco, Los Angeles or New York City—and is torn between the two options. "I get the comment all the time," she said. "'It's between Denver and Austin.'"
After the Great Recession, Colorado saw an economic diversification that spanned many industries, including aerospace, bioscience and digital communications. Starting around 2013, Denver began attracting Bay Area tech companies, which often opened a customer service or sales office. These companies quickly discovered that their employees in other departments wanted to move to Denver, which promised a higher quality of life and a lower cost of living. This trend continued during the pandemic, with some companies such as Marqeta and Salesforce opening new offices or expanding existing ones.
If this sounds similar to Austin's trajectory, that's because it is. Although the two cities have invested in different industries, there is some overlap. "I would say that we compete with Austin on a regular basis, predominantly for technology and financial services companies," said Sam Bailey, vice president of economic development at the Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation. "And it makes sense."
In the last decade or so, Austin and Denver have proven their value to prominent tech companies in search of a diversely skilled, millennial workforce, which is, in turn, drawn to the two cities because of their relative affordability, big city amenities and natural beauty.
(Graphic by Emma Freer)
Now the question is: Can the two cities keep this up? "I think what both communities share is this responsibility to focus on the future," Bailey said, citing housing affordability, mobility and equity as issues Austin and Denver must confront.
Ivy moved to Denver around a decade ago, following her now-wife, and immediately felt a vibe similar to Austin's. Both cities are neighborly, with a strong food-and-drink culture and family-friendly amenities. Due to their popularity, they are also facing similar housing challenges. "Our markets are insane," she said. "It's just incredibly competitive, very challenging, low inventory, skyrocketing prices."
But there are some key differences. Ivy thinks Denver has better weather—temperate, yet seasonal—and a more robust transit system, where Austin wins on live music and diversity. "Denver is very white," she said.
Ariel Hernandez is moving to Denver work his new job. (Ariel Hernandez)
Ariel Hernandez, 28, will be making the move from Austin to Denver later this month, where he has a new job at the DISH Network headquarters. "I think there are a lot of similarities between the two cities," he told Austonia. The Houston-born resident will miss his family, friends and Whataburger. But he's excited about the change. "I feel like I've done everything I needed to do," he said.
- How Austin became a boomtown in the 21st century - austonia ›
- Bay area tech workers eye moving to Austin post-pandemic - austonia ›
- Miami vs. Austin: Which Sun city will win the California tech-odus ... ›
- Migration insights of Austin, who is moving to the city and who is ... ›
- Austin ranks more dangerous than Dallas, Houston and Fort Worth ... ›
- Austin millennials lead recent labor union drives - austonia ›
- How Charlotte, North Carolina compares to Austin, Texas - austonia ›
Texas voters are split on whether Gov. Greg Abbott should run for a third term and whether Matthew McConaughey should run at all. But Democrats are clear: they want to see Beto O'Rourke on the ballot.
These are the findings of a Quinnipiac University poll of registered voters released this week.
Abbott and McConaughey received the highest favorability ratings of the elected officials, candidates and potential candidates, according to the Quinnipiac poll.
- Abbott: 49%
- McConaughey: 42%
- O'Rourke: 34%
- Former Texas GOP Chair Allen West: 25%
- Former Texas senator and Republican challenger Don Huffines: 8%
Overall, 48% say Abbott does not deserve to be reelected to a third term compared to 46% who say he does. "A Trump favorite in a state that is turning less red in recent election cycles, Abbott has a decent but in no way overwhelming grasp on reelection," Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said in a press release.
Abbott, McConaughey and Beto O'Rourke could vie for governor in 2022. (Office of the Texas Governor)
Voters are also divided on Matthew McConaughey, who is reportedly considering a gubernatorial run. Forty-one percent of voters say they would like to see him run, compared to 47% who say they wouldn't.
The poll found that Democrats and Independents favor the Oscar-winning Austinite, whose party affiliation is unclear. Forty-seven percent of Democrats would like to see him run, compared to 43% who wouldn't. Forty-four percent of Independents would, compared to 43% who wouldn't. Republicans, on the other hand, say 60%-29% they would not like to see him run.
Another possible candidate is former U.S. Representative and presidential hopeful Beto O'Rourke, who is also reportedly mulling a bid. Overall voters say 52%-41% they would not like to see him run for governor. But 77% of Democrats and 50% of Independents would, according to the poll.
"McConaughey and O'Rourke may still be on the fence, but their numbers suggest they have the attention of voters," Malloy said in the same release.
- Ted Cruz says Matthew McConaughey is a "formidable" candidate ... ›
- Abbott vs. Beto 2022: the race to become Texas Governor - austonia ›
- McConaughey mulls masking, running for Texas governor - austonia ›
- Most Austin voters support Matthew McConaughey for governor ... ›
- Texans vote McConaughey in latest governor poll - austonia ›
Austinites will soon be able to train like some of Hollywood's biggest stars as F45, a fitness franchise backed by major celebs, like Mark Wahlberg and David Beckham, is on its way to Austin.
F45 listed Austin as the location of its corporate headquarters in a June 21 federal filing—a big shift for the California company. The fitness franchise is preparing for its initial public offering, which will be as an Austin-based company.
F45 will be one of many California companies—Tesla, Oracle and Samsung—that have recently expanded in the Capital City. The company has several famous investors on its side—famed basketball player Earvin "Magic" Johnson and golfer Greg Norman in addition to Wahlberg and Beckham.
The fitness company is opening a 44,000-square-foot headquarters, located at Penn Field on 801 Barton Springs Road, with a lease running through 2029. F45 was one of the early adopters of Austin-based real estate-technology platform AnthemIQ, helping tenants find commercial real estate.
F45 focuses on one-on-one 45-minute workouts, which patrons watch on in-studio displays. With 2,247 franchise agreements spanning across 63 countries, F45 also has offices in Australia and England.
"We believe this flexibility will enable us to capitalize on our estimated long-term global opportunity of over 23,000 studios," the company said in its filing.
The greater Austin area already has 11 F45 locations, which take up 1,600 square feet of space each.
- Lone Star rivalry starts early for Austin FC in preseason cup - austonia ›
- Austin-based female influencers to follow on Instagram - austonia ›
- Carrie Underwood's fitness brand has a pop-up shop in Austin ... ›
The staffers are coming! Texas Lege staffers turn to Twitter after special session announcement, defunding
Texas Legislature staff members have taken to social media to raise awareness—and also just air their misfortunes—following the summer special session announcement and their own defunding.
In a game-seven-type move by Texas Democrats, the 87th Texas Legislative session was capped off by a last-minute walkout to avoid a final vote on a bill that would add restrictions to voting.
Needless to say, Gov. Greg Abbott—who cheerleaded the bill throughout the legislative session—was not thrilled.
Not up to date on your Texas Lege drama? Abbott was pointing to when former Texas State Senator Wendy Davis staged a dramatic hours-long filibuster over a 2013 abortion bill, which the public gallery aided. The "story" Abbott is referring to ended with him and other prominent conservatives sweeping the 2014 statewide election and the bill passing in a special session.
According to Abbott, the regular session centered around supporting "hardworking Texans and building a state that is safer, freer, healthier, and more prosperous."
However, the two items deemed at the top of Abbott's wish list for this session—election integrity and bail reform—did not reach his desk at the end of the session, both championed by Abbott to be "must-pass emergency items."
"It is deeply disappointing and concerning for Texans that neither reached my desk," Abbott said in a statement. "Ensuring the integrity of our elections and reforming a broken bail system remain emergencies in Texas, which is why these items, along with other priority items, will be added to the special session agenda."
Abbott said he expected lawmakers to work out their differences prior to the special session and continue to pass other emergency items and priority legislation.
So, everything is cool, right? No worries?
Hours before the no vote, as the clock ran out on the bill that he championed, Abbott tweeted that he would veto funding for the entire state legislative branch. The decision would impact not only Texas lawmakers but their staff and aides. "No pay for those who abandon their responsibilities," Abbott tweeted May 31.
I will veto Article 10 of the budget passed by the legislature. Article 10 funds the legislative branch. No pay… https://t.co/KNyuNvxP55— Greg Abbott (@Greg Abbott)1622484820.0
With pay, health insurance and other support for staffers on the line, the threats became a reality on June 18 with an official veto of the funds from Abbott.
The veto effectively nixes all funding for the legislative branch.
"Texans don't run from a legislative fight and we don't walk away from an unfinished business," Abbott wrote in the veto. "Funding should not be provided for those who quit their job early, leaving their state with unfinished business and exposing taxpayers to higher costs for an additional legislative session."
However, questions have been brought up over the constitutionality of the veto itself. Section 24 of the Texas Constitution makes not paying members of the legislature illegal.
The special session is set to begin July 8. So, what does this mean for lawmakers, staffers and aides?
No pay, no insurance... and Twitter followers?
The staffers took their final stand on Twitter where they aired their grievances with the situation and asked for followers to increase their footprint.
Meet Jen Ramos, a staff member for Texas State Senator Judith Zaffarini—and also defunded by Abbott.
My name is Jen. I’m one of the #txlege staffers defunded by Greg Abbott. Apparently now I’m supposed to ask for Tw… https://t.co/pteKADP3Hj— Jen Ramos ✨ (@Jen Ramos ✨)1624466531.0
And she's not alone. Use the hashtag #txlege and you'll find other similar messages online, like Camille's and Hector's and more.
My name is Camille, my friends call me Cam or Cammie. I’m one of the #txlege staffers defunded by Greg Abbott. And… https://t.co/mOvcjxTiUL— Camille Lasin (@Camille Lasin)1624474153.0
My name is Hector. I’m one of the #txlege staffers defunded by Greg Abbott and who had to deal with elections stuff… https://t.co/88PINm9KCv— Hector 🏙🤠 (@Hector 🏙🤠)1624466987.0
My name is Jake Salinas. I'm the TX Dem that saved the film industry in TX and broke quorum on SB7 Now our Gov h… https://t.co/PLf9ScA4Ev— Jake Salinas (@Jake Salinas)1624464237.0
It's unclear whether Abbott and other prominent Republican lawmakers will come together with Democrats to overturn the veto and continue providing insurance and regular pay for lawmakers, staffers and aides.