In the three days since one of Austin FC's top-billed players, Cecilio Dominguez, was abruptly announced as suspended pending an investigation into "possible off-field misconduct," rumors have swirled—but the club itself has remained tight-lipped.
Dominguez, who was tied as Austin's top goalscorer last season and is one of three star "Designated Players," will leave a large hole in his absence. Once dubbed the "David Beckham rule," players with Designated Player status are often the top players on a team's roster and can be paid above the league's salary cap. Player salaries have not yet been released for this season, but Dominguez's pay is likely similar to his $1.7 million salary last year.
.@MLS is suspending @AustinFC midfielder Cecilio Dominguez pending an investigation into “possible off-field misconduct”. pic.twitter.com/NFq7tKOvDe
— Stew Myrick (@StewMyrick) April 9, 2022
A since-dropped domestic violence and psychological damage lawsuit was filed against Dominguez in 2017 by his ex-partner in Paraguay. However, no details on what alleged misconduct occurred have been made available.
Here's what we do know:
Austin FC reported the alleged misconduct to the league. The news came just a day after the Verde player celebrated his newly-minted green card on Thursday, leaving many to assume the club learned of his alleged misconduct on Friday, just before an official statement was issued. Austin FC seemed quick to report to the MLS, unlike recently at the Portland Timbers, where Andy Polo remained on the club for several days after news of domestic violence allegations were flagged to the team.
The club will not comment on details surrounding the investigation. The club told reporters it would not comment on Dominguez's investigation in its post-match press conference Sunday, although head coach Josh Wolff mentioned the adjustment made to the starting lineup as the news broke less than 48 hours before the club's Sunday match.
"We talk a lot about resiliency and hard work... those are the foundations," Wolff said. "And sure, there was something that happened this week that obviously affects our group to some degree, but that was never going to be an excuse."
When asked about when, if ever, Dominguez may return to the lineup, Wolff said it's "not something we discuss."
- Austin FC beats FC Cincinnati 5-0 in first 2022 match at Q2 Stadium ... ›
- Three takeaways from Austin's 1-0 win to Minnesota United - austonia ›
- PROFILE: It's prime time for Cecilio Dominguez, Austin FC's first ... ›
- Designated Player Cecilio Dominguez is joining Austin FC in his ... ›
- Austin FC's Cecilio Dominguez suspended before home match ... ›
- Austin FC's Cecilio Dominguez returns after MLS investigation - austonia ›
- Dominguez, summer heat shrouds Austin FC in 1-0 LA Galaxy loss - austonia ›
- Austin FC's Cecilio Dominguez prepares for his return despite fan backlash over domestic dispute - austonia ›
- Meet Austin FC's millionaires and more salary data - austonia ›
Flyers are less satisfied with the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport than a year ago, a new study shows.
Research firm J.D. Power placed ABIA at No. 15 on a list ranking overall customer satisfaction at large airports, a slip from last year’s spot at No. 7. Other Texas airports secured rankings ahead of Austin, with Dallas Love Field at third, Houston Hobby at eight, and San Antonio International Airport at ninth.
Dallas/Ft. Worth ranked eight in the "mega airport" category.
The study examined airports based on the following factors: terminal facilities; airport arrival/departure; baggage claim; security check; check-in/baggage check; and food, beverage and retail.
On a 1,000-point scale, Austin-Bergstrom received 785 points this year compared to its score of 819 in 2021.
Passenger experiences at Austin-Bergstrom have been influenced by population growth in Central Texas, which has brought record traffic and longer wait times at TSA. And a recent power outage at Austin-Bergstrom caused flight delays. Michael Taylor, travel intelligence lead at J.D. Power., said that consumer satisfaction with flying has decreased overall.
“The combination of pent-up demand for air travel, the nationwide labor shortage and steadily rising prices on everything from jet fuel to a bottle of water have created a scenario in which airports are extremely crowded and passengers are increasingly frustrated—and it is likely to continue through 2023,” Taylor said.
Bailey Grimmett, a spokesperson for ABIA, commented on the ranking.
“We're grateful that AUS customers continue to rank our airport above average, especially during this year that saw air travel disruption here in Austin and across the globe as airports, airlines and the air travel industry continued navigating the impacts of the pandemic,” Grimmett said. “We look forward to delivering near-term and long-term improvements through our Journey With AUS program to improve the passenger experience.”
That program is slated to bring a new midfield concourse to increase gates and connect to the Barbara Jordan Terminal through an underground connector tunnel.
- July was Austin-Bergstrom airport's fifth-busiest month ever amid ... ›
- Complete guide to Austin-Bergstrom International Airport - austonia ›
- New changes coming to the Austin Airport in 2022 - austonia ›
- Austin-Bergstrom International Airport sees high traffic - austonia ›
- Traffic plans as Austin airport expects 20M people this year - austonia ›
- Busy Memorial Day travel season starts smoothly at the airport ... ›
- Austin airport will close South Terminal as part of expansion - austonia ›
By Jonathan Lee
The Planning Commission was split Tuesday on whether to help save an eclectic lakefront estate from demolition by zoning it historic amid concerns over tax breaks and the likelihood that a previous owner participated in segregation as a business owner.
The property in question, known as the Delisle House, is located at 2002 Scenic Drive in Tarrytown. The main house, with Spanish and Modern influences, was built in 1923 by Raymond Delisle, an optician. A Gothic Revival accessory apartment was built in 1946. The current owner applied to demolish the structures in order to build a new home.'
Historic preservationists, for their part, overwhelmingly support historic zoning, which would preserve the buildings in perpetuity. The Historic Landmark Commission unanimously voted to initiate historic zoning in July, citing architectural significance, landscape features and association to historic figures. City staffers recommend historic zoning, calling both structures one-of-a-kind examples of vernacular architecture.
Tarrytown neighbors have also banded together to stop the demolition. Many have written letters, and a few spoke at the meeting. “How could anyone buy this property with the intent of destroying it?” Ila Falvey said. “I think it’s an architectural treasure.”
Michael Whellan, an attorney representing the property owner, said that the claims made by preservationists are shaky. The buildings are run down, he said, and have had substantial renovations. A structural engineer hired by the owner said any attempt at preservation would involve tearing down and rebuilding – an undertaking Whellan said would likely cost millions.
Whellan also argued that any historical significance derived from the property’s association with Delisle and longtime owner C.H. Slator is dubious. “These men are not noted for any civic, philanthropic or historic impact,” he said.
What’s more, according to Whellan, Slator likely participated in segregation as the owner of the Tavern on North Lamar Boulevard between 1953 and 1960.
A city staffer, however, said she found no evidence to support the claim. “We would never landmark a property where a segregationist lived, or there was a racist person,” Kimberly Collins with the Historic Preservation Office said.
Commissioner Awais Azhar couldn’t support historic zoning in part due to lingering uncertainty about Slator. “Focusing on that factor is not here to disparage an individual or family. It is not about playing the race card. This is an important assertion for us to consider as Planning commissioners,” Azhar said.
Commissioner Carmen Llanes Pulido said that allegations of racism should come as no surprise. “We’re talking about white male property owners in the 1950s, in Austin, on the west side – and of course they were racist,” she said. But she argued that allowing the house to be demolished based on these grounds does nothing to help people of color who have been harmed by racism and segregation.
The question of tax breaks was also controversial. Michael Gaudini, representing the property owner, said that the tax breaks associated with historic zoning would exacerbate inequality by shifting property tax burdens to less affluent communities. City staffers estimate that the property, appraised at $3.5 million, would get either a $8,500 or $16,107 property tax break annually, depending on whether a homestead exemption is applied.
Commissioner Grayson Cox preferred the commission focus not on tax breaks but on whether the structures merit preservation. “To me, nothing in the historic preservation criteria lists, is this person deserving of a tax break or not?”
Azhar, on the other hand, said he plans to propose a code amendment getting rid of city property tax breaks for historic properties.
The commission fell one vote short of recommending historic zoning, with six commissioners in support and three opposed. Azhar and commissioners Claire Hempel and Greg Anderson voted against.
The odds of City Council zoning over an owner’s wishes are slim. Nine out of 11 members must vote in favor, and there have only been a handful of such cases over the past several decades.