The Austin Police Department is investigating an officer-involved "gun battle" on Sixth Street that left one 17-year-old dead early Saturday morning.
APD officers were responding to a DWI call a block away when they heard gunshots in the entertainment district at around 1 a.m. The officers arrived to find two groups of men shooting at one another. An officer began firing gunshots as well.
A 17-year-old Black male was left with critical injuries and taken to the hospital, where police say he died at some point in the morning. It has not been determined whether the teen died from officer-fired bullets or from the other group involved in the shooting.
Per APD policy, the officer has been put on administrative leave as an investigation continues. Two people believed to be involved were detained minutes after the shootout and a gun has been located.
This is the sixth officer-involved shooting in Austin this year, according to KVUE. The Sixth Street crime also comes after a series of shootings in the area, including a mass shooting that killed one and injured 13 others earlier this year.
Police Chief Joseph Chacon, who says gun violence is a large culprit for the city's uptick in crime, said that the department is continuing to work to eliminate gun crime with its gun violence prevention program.
"I continue to tell people if you're coming downtown, please enjoy the entertainment district, please enjoy it safely, and please don't bring a firearm," Chacon said in a media briefing.
The city is also working to make Sixth Street safer, installing brighter LED bulbs in 64 light fixtures on the street and planning other measures with their "Safer Sixth Street" resolution.
Body cam footage was captured in the moments that the officer fired the weapon, according to Chacon. The police chief also requested that anyone with information on the shooting call 911 or the Crimestoppers tipline at 512-472-8477 as they continue their investigation.
- Austin murders increase 79% year-over-year in May - austonia ›
- Does Dirty 6th live up to its name? Here's how crime stacks up in ... ›
- Here's how crime stacks up in Austin's party districts - austonia ›
- Another 6th Street shooting leaves two critically injured - austonia ›
- Mother of five left paralyzed after Sixth Street mass shooting - austonia ›
- Police charge 15 year old in 6th Street mass shooting - austonia ›
- New York tourist dies after Sixth Street shooting - austonia ›
- 6th Street mass shooting leaves 13 people injured - austonia ›
- Teen killed in 'gun battle' on Sixth Street identified - austonia ›
- Sixth Street sees second shooting in a week as city rushes to improve safety - austonia ›
- Man shot and killed in shootout with Austin Police Officers - austonia ›
By Jonathan Lee
The Planning Commission was split Tuesday on whether to help save an eclectic lakefront estate from demolition by zoning it historic amid concerns over tax breaks and the likelihood that a previous owner participated in segregation as a business owner.
The property in question, known as the Delisle House, is located at 2002 Scenic Drive in Tarrytown. The main house, with Spanish and Modern influences, was built in 1923 by Raymond Delisle, an optician. A Gothic Revival accessory apartment was built in 1946. The current owner applied to demolish the structures in order to build a new home.'
Historic preservationists, for their part, overwhelmingly support historic zoning, which would preserve the buildings in perpetuity. The Historic Landmark Commission unanimously voted to initiate historic zoning in July, citing architectural significance, landscape features and association to historic figures. City staffers recommend historic zoning, calling both structures one-of-a-kind examples of vernacular architecture.
Tarrytown neighbors have also banded together to stop the demolition. Many have written letters, and a few spoke at the meeting. “How could anyone buy this property with the intent of destroying it?” Ila Falvey said. “I think it’s an architectural treasure.”
Michael Whellan, an attorney representing the property owner, said that the claims made by preservationists are shaky. The buildings are run down, he said, and have had substantial renovations. A structural engineer hired by the owner said any attempt at preservation would involve tearing down and rebuilding – an undertaking Whellan said would likely cost millions.
Whellan also argued that any historical significance derived from the property’s association with Delisle and longtime owner C.H. Slator is dubious. “These men are not noted for any civic, philanthropic or historic impact,” he said.
What’s more, according to Whellan, Slator likely participated in segregation as the owner of the Tavern on North Lamar Boulevard between 1953 and 1960.
A city staffer, however, said she found no evidence to support the claim. “We would never landmark a property where a segregationist lived, or there was a racist person,” Kimberly Collins with the Historic Preservation Office said.
Commissioner Awais Azhar couldn’t support historic zoning in part due to lingering uncertainty about Slator. “Focusing on that factor is not here to disparage an individual or family. It is not about playing the race card. This is an important assertion for us to consider as Planning commissioners,” Azhar said.
Commissioner Carmen Llanes Pulido said that allegations of racism should come as no surprise. “We’re talking about white male property owners in the 1950s, in Austin, on the west side – and of course they were racist,” she said. But she argued that allowing the house to be demolished based on these grounds does nothing to help people of color who have been harmed by racism and segregation.
The question of tax breaks was also controversial. Michael Gaudini, representing the property owner, said that the tax breaks associated with historic zoning would exacerbate inequality by shifting property tax burdens to less affluent communities. City staffers estimate that the property, appraised at $3.5 million, would get either a $8,500 or $16,107 property tax break annually, depending on whether a homestead exemption is applied.
Commissioner Grayson Cox preferred the commission focus not on tax breaks but on whether the structures merit preservation. “To me, nothing in the historic preservation criteria lists, is this person deserving of a tax break or not?”
Azhar, on the other hand, said he plans to propose a code amendment getting rid of city property tax breaks for historic properties.
The commission fell one vote short of recommending historic zoning, with six commissioners in support and three opposed. Azhar and commissioners Claire Hempel and Greg Anderson voted against.
The odds of City Council zoning over an owner’s wishes are slim. Nine out of 11 members must vote in favor, and there have only been a handful of such cases over the past several decades.
What's new in Austin food & drink this week:
- Nau's Enfield Drug closing after losing their lease. Did McGuire Moorman Lambert buy the building, with its vintage soda fountain?
- Nixta Taqueria Chef Edgar Rico named to Time Magazine's Time 100 Next influencer list, after winning a James Beard Award earlier this year.
- Question: From what BBQ joint did pescatarian Harry Styles order food this week?
- Austin Motel is opening the pool and pool bar Wednesday nights in October for Freaky Floats.
- Vincent's on the Lake closing due to "economic conditions and low water levels [at Lake Travis]."
- Cenote has closed its Windsor Park location. The East Cesar Chavez location remains open.
- The Steeping Room on N. Lamar has closed.
- Local startup It's Skinnyscored new financing for its gluten-free pasta business.
- P. Terry's opened a new location in Kyle, at 18940 IH-35.